|
When buying a long-term-care insurance policy, consumers typically
focus on benefit payments, features and cost. An issue that's often
overlooked but that needs to be examined early on is whether the plan
qualifies for federal and, in some cases, state tax deductions.
Companies often issue tax-qualified and nonqualified versions of an
LTC plan. Many advisors consider the tax benefits of the tax-qualified
plan essential, in part because it is what makes LTC plans affordable
for many buyers. Others contend that the nonqualified versions not only
are less restrictive than qualified policies, but can still qualify
for some tax benefits. (Some companies allow policyholders to convert
their tax qualified plan to a nonqualified plan.) The decision as to
which type of policy to choose is compounded by the fact that the Internal
Revenue Service has not ruled on this tax-deductibility issue.
Under a 1996 federal law, all LTC plans issued before 1997 are treated
as tax qualified as long as they met state standards at the time. Plans
issued in 1997 and later must meet standards described in the 1996 act
in order to qualify for tax benefits similar to those for major medical
insurance.
Some of the standards focus on consumer protection. For example, tax-qualified
plans must provide specific information that allows the consumer to
easily compare competing policies. The plans generally cannot exclude
certain medical conditions, with some exceptions. And the insurance
company cannot cancel a policy except for nonpayment of premiums, and
even that cancellation is restricted.
Other tax-qualifying standards address specific policy features. A key
feature is what triggers benefit payments. One trigger involves the
inability to perform without substantial assistance at least two of
six activities of daily living (ADLs): bathing, continence, dressing,
eating, toileting and transferring. Furthermore, a doctor must certify
that the person is unable to perform two or more ADLs for at least 90
days.
Benefit payments also may be triggered if the person requires substantial
supervision due to "severe" cognitive impairment, such as
Alzheimer's disease.
A policy that doesn't qualify for favored tax treatment is one that
includes /11 medical necessity" as a trigger or the inability to
perform only one of seven ADLs (ambulation may be included, which may
provide for coverage sooner than the others). And the cognitive impairment
trigger does not have to be "severe." (If you buy a nonqualified
plan, you must sign a disclosure statement acknowledging that the plan
is unqualified.)
Why be concerned about the tax issues, especially if a nonqualified
plan potentially is less restrictive? Two reasons.
First, with a tax-qualified plan you can deduct a portion of the cost
of your premiums, depending on your age and your overall medical expenses.
For tax year 2002, a person age 51-60 can deduct $900, while someone
71 or older can deduct $2,990. This deduction amount is included with
your other medical deductions for the year, and only the amount of your
total deductions that exceed 7.5 percent of your adjusted gross income
qualifies for an actual deduction. (The self-employed may qualify for
additional premium deductions.)
Second, benefits paid out from tax-qualified LTC plans generally are
not subject to federal income tax (21 states also exempt the benefits
from tax). The exception is indemnity plans, which pay a set amount
per day, regardless of what the care actually costs. For 2002, any daily
indemnity payout above $210 (adjusted annually for inflation) is subject
to federal income tax, unless that additional payout goes to pay for
qualified LTC services.
Many experts agree that the premiums paid into nonqualified plans don't
qualify for a tax deduction, but they see that as a less crucial issue
because the dollar amounts are not as significant. The more important
issue is whether the benefits paid out are taxable as income. Benefit
payouts can easily amount to $50,000 or more a year, and the custodial
expenses do not qualify as a deduction to offset that income, so taxability
is a significant issue.
Without IRS guidance, taxpayers and their financial advisors are on
their own. Many advisors and taxpayers don't treat the benefit payments
as taxable income. Other advisors caution that individuals should stick
with qualified plans, even if they are more restrictive because of the
potential tax bite. Consult with your financial planner for the latest
on this issue.
October -30- 2002
|
,
Retirement Asset Management, Inc (RAM)
Securities offered through Prime Capital Services, Inc (PCS).~ MemberFINRA/SIPC.
Investment Advisory Services offered through Asset & Financial
Planning, LTD. (AFP). PCS and AFP are affiliated entities.
Prime Retirement Asset Management (PRAM), Inc., PRAM, LLC, Prime Wealth Management, LLC (PWM), are not affiliated with PCS or AFP.
Another Poughkeepsie
Journal Website
|